Talal Abu-Ghazaleh

The UN has entered an important phase in its work on AI governance, with consultations taking place throughout April 2026. I proudly served in several UN bodies over the years, including my time as Chairman of the UN Global Alliance for ICT and Development, having seen firsthand how international processes evolve when technological change forces institutions to rethink their assumptions. The current consultations, which include written submissions from governments, scientists, industry specialists and civil society, are part of the emerging Global Dialogue on AI Governance.

These efforts will shape the formal programme expected in May and will lead to the first Global Dialogue session in Geneva during the AI for Good Global Summit in July under the ITU. This shows that the UN is attempting to build a broad and inclusive process, although the effectiveness of the outcome will depend on how well it reflects the realities of a changing world.

When I began my professional life in accounting and auditing, the world economy was dominated by a small group of industrial powers, and the developing world had limited influence over global decision‑making. Today the situation is different. The rise of the BRICS economies and the growing weight of the Global South have altered the balance of capabilities, and this shift is visible in technology, manufacturing, trade and digital infrastructure. AI rapidly accelerates these changes as it rewards long‑term investment in knowledge, education and national planning. Those that build strong digital foundations will shape the next stage of global development, and those that do not will find themselves dependent on others.
Nations must be able to design and manage their own digital systems, train their own specialists and develop their own regulatory frameworks. Taking TAG.Global as an example, I can vouch for how investment in skills and infrastructure can transform institutions and create opportunities for young people. The same principle applies to AI. Those that rely entirely on imported systems will not control their future, while those that build local capabilities will be able to participate in global innovation on equal terms.

The UN consultations offer an opportunity to recognize this reality. A governance model that reflects only the priorities of technologically advanced states will not be sustainable, and the world has already moved beyond that stage. The consultations must acknowledge the diversity of national interests and the need for shared access to knowledge and infrastructure. They must also recognize that many developing countries are not seeking special treatment, but rather a fair chance to contribute to global progress. When I speak with young innovators, I see a strong desire to participate in the knowledge economy, and I believe all nations and firms can play a meaningful role if they invest in AI, education, research and digital transformation.

AI will reshape global economic structures in more fundamental ways that earlier technological revolutions reshaped industry and trade. Let me be clear that we are not just talking about passive tech of the past here, we are talking about a new generation of intelligence machines and systems which require new rules of engagement. We have not seen anything like this in the past and nations that prepare for this transition will strengthen their competitiveness. Those that delay will face greater challenges. The UN process can help guide this transition, but it must be grounded in the realities of a multipolar world and a proper understanding of the technology and the implications this brings.
I applaud all the work the UN is doing in the realm of AI, particularly at this difficult time where the world is in a period of great uncertainty. Those that plan and invest today will forge ahead tomorrow. Let’s make sure we are all part of this revolution and not just mere bystanders.