Globalisation,
as it has been termed, was a short, artificial and mislabelled stage that is
now clinically dying. It has been characterised in the past as well as to this
day as a "democratic" evaluation in the areas of governance,
management and industry and at the same time in inefficiency and declining
ability to analyse information and make decisions. Its remnants are still present
in various parts of the world where individuals enjoy measures of free
opinions, conclusions and deductions.
Modern
technology, however, especially artificial intelligence and machine learning,
comes now to swing this path upside down, opening the door to detailed
information-gathering and analysis, the likes of which has never been
previously seen, and which will inevitably have an effect on law- and
policy-making.
It
took Europe 20 years to move out of the dark ages to the Renaissance, but in
the new information age this will involve much less time for us in the Arab
region for two main reasons: First, this new global digital progress moves no
longer in steps but in strides, and secondly because the Arab consumer of this
technology received it readily packaged. The world today is facing the most
efficient and productive autocracy in information technology.
The
democratic globalisation era was in yester years the optimal mechanism in a
given society to filter human options and transform the majority’s decisions into
state policies under the roof of the law and the criterion of protecting
minority rights. Today, deep and focused oversight mechanism rises for the
production of these laws and policies through data processing and machine
learning.
However,
along with the huge growth in the various capital indicators of the digital
revolution, we find the majority of people getting poorer to an extent that it
is a serious problem we have to face head-on. I had demanded from the rostrum
of the UN to focus on social impacts of technology because economy was
initially designed to serve societies and build civilisations rather than drown
in a swamp of capitals and looting by a few influential figures, simply because
they control the digital technology and channel it to influence their
vulnerable users.
Today,
we coexist inside communities disciplined by these strongmen’s control. From
home to school to work and to hospital, severely disciplined communities are
under the vigilant and sustainably controlling eyes where people work and
operate. This is the new digital autocracy gradually replacing democratic
thoughts and acts. It takes away individual behaviours to establish a shaking
and dysfunctional but strong and aware relationship between the governors
(observer) and the governed (observed), leading to slide the latter, without
being aware, into typical living and thinking. This is the intellectual
autocracy that will spread soon like a wildfire.
We
must turn into knowledge-producing societies, as we are responsible for guiding
our grandchildren to think right and spread a mainstream investment in
innovative culture and provide a suitable environment that will contribute to
the renaissance of humanity and, as a result, quickly change the behaviour of
states and nations. This will have an inevitable effect on global power, as
those nations that can wield this technology will come up trumps.
Technology
presents a unique opportunity for us that we must cease and claim dominance in.
State control over citizens is backing off now to the digital institutions
control over consumers that have formed a new digital based autocracy. It is a
whole new world coming to us in earnest, opening the doors into its wide
avenues filled with surprises and opportunities.
It
is my sincere hope that we be remembered by our younger generations as
forefathers that thought wisely and acted promptly in light of having such
technology at our disposal. It is in democratising our very existence as humans
and providing a digital autocracy that we must claim our place.