A
civilization is a set of principles, cultures, traditions, systems and branches
of knowledge. It is an expression denoting several matters, all associated with
advancement and progress, even though they are two different concepts.
Advancement in methods and technologies does not necessarily mean progress, as
the latter means adding a material value, moving forward to something better,
not just something new!
The
Anglo-Saxon countries are uniform nations that share the same culture,
traditions, customs and systems. Among the most notable features they have in
common is their application of democracy, which has grown and developed in the
first half of the past century. Democracy is facing a great challenge against populism
and may not stand a chance in the face of that defiant opponent. A study
conducted by the Economist Intelligence Unit finds that half of the earth’s
population are living without democracy and only 5% of them live under regimes
that may be precisely described as democracies.
The
Anglo-Saxon civilization is attributed to Britain, America, Australia, Canada
and Ireland. Notwithstanding this fact, the first spark of that civilization
originated in Saxony-Germany and moved to
England, from which it spread to the world following the emergence of the
Germanic language.
A
quality true of the Anglo-Saxon civilization is that it is an industrial one.
It is based on exploiting the natural resources for the purpose of enhancing living.
It is also a capitalist civilization that selfishly devours the world’s
resources, leaving one half of the Earth’s population living on a maximum daily
income of $3 US dollars, while the other half drowns in trillions of dollars!
Among
the most significant manifestations of the Anglo-Saxon civilization is the
knowledge revolution fueled by artificial intelligence, totally devoid of moral
and humanitarian motives. This poses the question, how long will it take to
move forward from the knowledge revolution to the wisdom revolution? That is a
revolution that will aim first and foremost - in addition to technological and
scientific advancement, innovation and power - at establishing justice. It will
cause a profound upheaval in values: from “I,” “my state,” “my group,” or “my
faction” to “my world.”
It
is about time we move from pursuing knowledge to pursuing wisdom for every
human being on earth to have a sense of responsibility. We should think of
equality and the future instead of selling the future for the present, that
will soon be no more.
Among
the most substantial factors that will push the present civilization to ruins,
is scarcity of resources and pollution. The former is the natural outcome of
the ongoing depletion. Sadly, 50% of animal resources on earth have been used
up throughout the past 50 years! The other 50% are expected to be deplete totally
within the coming 50 years! As for the threat of pollution, the world is
ignoring it despite the expected existential challenge humanity will face
within the coming 10 years because of global warming and environmental
pollution.
Personally,
the term inter-civilization dialogue and its relevant conferences have always
been an endless source of amazement. Civilization does not live, prosper, then
enter into dialogues. Rather, when a civilization is born, another civilization
must be fading in return. Studies suggest that the Anglo-Saxon civilization will
be short-lived and cannot be expect to continue for hundreds of years. This is
not a political talk that discusses military domination or who will rule the
world. It is a talk about the values, democratic systems, industrial revolution
and capitalist concepts represented by this civilization. They will all fade
away to pave the way for the birth of a very new civilization.
The
end of the Anglo-Saxon civilization has nothing to do with the US-Chinese
conflict, inter-European conflicts, or Europe’s conflicts with its opponents.
It has to do with the demand of creating a new international system, where we
can all coexist under the banner of justice without depletion of natural
resources.
The
Roman Empire did not collapse when it was no longer a major state or a major
economy. It became the architect of its own devastation when it focused on
military power and authority and disregarded concepts, such as equality among
subjects and spreading ethical principles, hence its collapse.
Why, therefore, does China raise concerns?
All
the leaders of the present civilization are apprehensive about a new
civilization made in China. Will China be able to impose its civilization on
the world? It may be useful to remember that all people saw the Roman
civilization as peculiar, but it ruled the world. Many recent American
statements criticize the peculiarity of the Chinese civilization, in terms of
their language, traditions and some aspects of their lifestyle.
The
real conflict has just begun. Racist inclinations have served to kindle it,
especially after the pandemic that brought to the surface the true selfish,
populist and undemocratic face of the world. Satisfaction with the democratic
system of rule has declined to its lowest point. It reached a peak towards the
middle of the past century. Then, the number of countries practicing democracy
retreated in the face of populism.
Finally, what will we do when we run out
of oil? What will we do after the extinction of our natural resources?
It is then that we will be aware that the
Anglo-Saxon civilization is ending. We will realize that the industrial economy
in the age of the knowledge revolution - and its associating revolution in
telecommunications and technology - is rapidly changing. It will be clear then
that the knowledge revolution is a double-edged sword. Just as it has been the
fastest instrument of development, it will be the swiftest weapon of
destruction of the present civilization!